ASTRA-ZENECA BUSINESS RELATIONS WITH
For those of our readers who are
familiar with an article by Thomas Smith entitled : A critical Exposé Of the Medical
establishment ( Those who are not please click on to it)
following the statement by Dr. David
Edsall, former Dean of The Harvard Medical School, Mr. Smith continues on with a
description of the drug companies control over your doctors decision on which
medications to prescribe. On Saturday, June 21st.2003 the following article
appeared in many of the newspapers in the New
York Metropolitan area and we are sure in the rest of the country. The title, Astra-Zeneca
pleads guilty in Cancer Medicine Scheme. The Muriel
S. Miller Foundation is pleased to see that this news confirms the information presented
in Thomas Smiths presentation of his Critical Exposé of The Medical Establishment
And The Pharmaceutical Industry. Here is the
article from the New York Times, Saturday, June 21st.2003 written by Melody
Petersen. It is condensed because of space limitations on our website. Astra-Zeneca Pleads Guilty In
Cancer Medicine Scheme
Wilmington,
del., June 20- Astra-Zeneca, the large pharmaceutical company, pleaded guilty today to a
felony charge of health care fraud and agreed to pay $355 million to settle criminal and
civil accusations that it engaged in a nationwide scheme to illegally market a prostate
cancer drug. The
government said the companys employees had given illegal financial inducements to as
many as 400 doctors across the country to persuade them to prescribe the drug, Zoladex.
Those inducements included thousands of free samples of Zoladex, worth hundreds of dollars
each, which the physicians then billed to Medicare and other federal health care programs,
prosecutors said. The company also gave doctors financial grants, paid them as consultants
and provided free travel and entertainment, the government said. The $355
million that Astra-Zeneca, a British company, agreed to pay is among the largest
settlements in a health care fraud case. Of that amount, about $64 million is a criminal
fine. The company will pay about $266 million to the federal government to settle most of
the civil accusations. An additional $25 million will go to settle accusations that it
defrauded the Medicaid programs, which are partly financed by the states. The largest fine
for health care fraud came in a settlement in October 2001 by TAP Pharmaceutical Products.
It agreed to pay $875 million to settle criminal and civil accusations that it had engaged
in a scheme that largely mirrors the allegations made by prosecutors against Astra-Zeneca. We
want doctors to prescribe what is best for their patients and not what is best for the
doctors bank account, Richard G. Andrews, first assistant United States
Attorney for the District Of Delaware, said at a news conference. He and other prosecutors
said the governments action should send a message to all pharmaceutical companies
that such conduct will not be
tolerated. Prosecutors
said that they did not plan to charge any Astra-Zeneca employees for the illegal
activities that they say began in 1991 and continued until last year. The
investigation did not discover any evidence to implicate Astra-Zenecas upper level
of management, Mr. Andrews said. Mr. Andrews said that Astra-Zeneca had reported
false and inflated prices for Zoladex to the federal government so that doctors could earn
significant profits by prescribing the drug. Medicare reimbursed the doctors based on the
inflated prices that Astra-Zeneca reported, he said, while the company charged doctors for
the drug at deep discounts. For example, the company reported to the government that the
average wholesale price for a monthly dose of Zoladex was about $ 300, prosecutors said,
but doctors were charged about $170 for that dose. That resulted in a $130 profit to the
doctor, the government said. Rachel
Bloom-Baglin, a spokeswoman for Astra-Zeneca, said today that the company was accepting
responsibility for giving doctors free samples of Zoladex with the understanding that they
would bill the government for them. These activities which took place from 1993 to 1996
resulted in the criminal charge. But she said that the company disagreed with the
prosecutors on the other charges, including the accusation that it had provided false and
inflated pricing information to the government. We disagree with the government on this
but to put it behind us we are agreeing to a settlement today. We believe that this is in
the best interest of our company and employees. We
strongly believe that the pricing for Zoladex was at all times lawful, she added.
Zoladex is one of a limited number of medicines that doctors buy direct from drug
companies and that Medicare now pays for. Many of these medicines are used for cancer
patients and are administered in doctors offices. Earlier, the
government charged three urologists with conspiring to bill the free Zoladex samples they
received from the company to the federal government. Two of these doctors have pleaded
guilty and await sentencing. Whether any further doctors should be charged is an
ongoing question, Mr. Andrews said. The governments seven-year investigation of the
marketing of Zoladex began after an executive at TAP, a competitor, filed a whistle-blower
lawsuit against both TAP and Astra-Zeneca, prosecutors said. The criminal investigation in
the TAP case is continuing. More than a dozen current and former employees have been
charged with conspiracy to pay kickbacks to doctors, including Alan MacKenzie, who was the
president of Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America at the time of the indictments. The whistle-blower, Douglas N.
Durand, a former vice president for sales at TAP will receive $47.5 million of the
settlement in the Astra-Zeneca case as allowed by federal law. Mr. Durand already received
$77 million from the TAP case. The two cases are part of a growing number of investigations and lawsuits into the marketing practices of pharmaceutical companies. Astra-Zeneca disclosed earlier this year that federal prosecutors in Boston had requested documents about the sale of Prilosec, a drug for ulcers and severe heartburn. The company also said the Federal Trade Commission was investigating its advertising and marketing of Nexium, the companys new heartburn drug. So much for the purple pill!! |